File #: 17510    Version: 0 Name: Csty (Earnings tax support)
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 2/14/2011 In control: County Legislature
On agenda: 2/14/2011 Final action: 2/14/2011
Title: A RESOLUTION offering support for the Kansas City, Missouri initiative to preserve the earnings tax.
Sponsors: Crystal Williams, Theresa Garza Ruiz, James D. Tindall, Scott Burnett
Indexes: 2011 COURTESY RESOLUTIONS, EARNINGS TAX
Attachments: 1. 17510adopt.pdf
IN THE COUNTY LEGISLATURE OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI

Title
A RESOLUTION offering support for the Kansas City, Missouri initiative to preserve the earnings tax.


Intro
RESOLUTION #17510, February 14, 2011

INTRODUCED BY Crystal Williams, Theresa Garza Ruiz, James D. Tindall, and Scott Burnett, County Legislators


Body
WHEREAS, on April 5, 2011, Kansas City voters will decide whether to continue the Kansas City earnings tax for the next five years; and,

WHEREAS, loss of the earnings tax would eliminate a significant revenue source for Kansas City, resulting in a decrease of $200.6 million in revenue to Kansas City; and,

WHEREAS, the earnings tax funds essential services for the citizens of Kansas City and Jackson County, including police and fire protection, snow removal, traffic light and street repair, sanitation, medical and emergency care, and social services for low-income families and children; and,

WHEREAS, the earnings taxes levied are the only way that Kansas City has to spread among the region's residents the cost of providing city services and amenities that serve the entire region such as the Kansas City Zoo and the Liberty Memorial; and,

WHEREAS, the loss of funds provided by the Kansas City earnings tax would impose greater taxes on Kansas City residents by forcing the entire tax burden of providing basic services and regional amenities to be carried by Kansas City residents alone and increase the strain on resources provided by Jackson County; and,

WHEREAS, loss of the earnings tax could lead to the elimination of a significant source of revenue for the Kansas City general fund, but does not authorize any replacement revenue sources and presents no realistic expectations that an increase in property or sales taxes would fill the void; and,

WHEREAS, numerous community, civic, and labor organizations have announced their support for the Kansas City earnings tax, citing concerns for the impact this initiative co...

Click here for full text